<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poniard Pharmaceuticals – Platinum Rediscovered  (Part II)</title>
	<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/poniard-pharmaceuticals-%e2%80%93-platinum-rediscovered-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Biotech stock reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ohad Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/poniard-pharmaceuticals-%e2%80%93-platinum-rediscovered-part-ii/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohad Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/poniard-pharmaceuticals-%e2%80%93-platinum-rediscovered-part-ii/#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mitch

Unfortunately, I haven't been following PARD for the past year or so due to timing constraints. 
In general, their clinical strategy is very good in terms of identifying a clinical need and picking the right indications. I have two issues with the ongoing SCLC phase III trial: 
1) They jumped straight to phase III without doing a smaller randomized phase two, so all the data we have is from two small (yet consistent) single arm studies.
2) Picoplatin might face competition from CELG's amrubicin that could reach the market shortly after picoplatin does. 

ohad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mitch</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I haven&#8217;t been following PARD for the past year or so due to timing constraints.<br />
In general, their clinical strategy is very good in terms of identifying a clinical need and picking the right indications. I have two issues with the ongoing SCLC phase III trial:<br />
1) They jumped straight to phase III without doing a smaller randomized phase two, so all the data we have is from two small (yet consistent) single arm studies.<br />
2) Picoplatin might face competition from CELG&#8217;s amrubicin that could reach the market shortly after picoplatin does. </p>
<p>ohad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Wise</title>
		<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/poniard-pharmaceuticals-%e2%80%93-platinum-rediscovered-part-ii/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/poniard-pharmaceuticals-%e2%80%93-platinum-rediscovered-part-ii/#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Just curious, are you still long PARD?  I am and have been reading everything I can get my hands on, including the subtleties of Picoplatin's effect on sensitive SCLC patients (2nd line) vs refactory/resistant, in order to gauge the risk involved with them meeting, or missing, their phase III target

This was a great piece you wrote.  I'm sure shareholders would love to hear an updated perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, are you still long PARD?  I am and have been reading everything I can get my hands on, including the subtleties of Picoplatin&#8217;s effect on sensitive SCLC patients (2nd line) vs refactory/resistant, in order to gauge the risk involved with them meeting, or missing, their phase III target</p>
<p>This was a great piece you wrote.  I&#8217;m sure shareholders would love to hear an updated perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
