The Real Star of ASH 2007 – Micromet

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

 

A lot of clinical data was published at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting, some of it quite impressive. Naturally, established drugs such as Millennium Pharmaceuticals‘ (MLNM) Velcade, Genentech’s (DNA) Rituxan and Celgene’s (CELG) Revlimid got most of the attention. In my opinion, the real star of the conference is MT-103 which is being co-developed by Micromet (MITI) and MedImmune, the biologics division of AstraZeneca (AZN). I won’t go too deep into describing the mechanism of action and the platform based on which MT-103 is built (I intend to do that in a review I hope to publish next week). However, the clinical data presented by Micromet is so impressive and so groundbreaking from several perspectives, that it must not be ignored.

  (more…)

SGEN’s partnership with MedImmune

Sunday, December 9th, 2007

 

The partnership with MedImmune, which dates back to 2005, is probably Seattle Genetics’ second most important partnership. On the scientific side, now that MedImmune has been merged with Cambridge Antibody Technology [CAT] to form AstraZeneca’s (AZN) biologics division, Seattle Genetics has a real antibody powerhouse on its side. On the financial side, Seattle Genetics could benefit from another pharma giant on its partner list, equipped with the 8th largest R&D budget in the industry and consequently the ability to support multiple clinical programs simultaneously. Looking at Immunogen’s partnership with Sanofi-Aventis, which has thus far led to 3 clinical programs, is making us hope that AstraZeneca will be to Seattle Genetics, what Sanofi is to Immunogen.

The cooperation with MedImmune originally revolved around one target – EphA2. This intriguing target is highly expressed in numerous solid cancers including breast, prostate and colorectal, which makes the potential opportunity immense. In addition, there is a growing body of scientific evidence that expression of EphA2 is associated with aggressiveness and poor survival, which makes its targeting very reasonable in advanced stages of the disease. The specific targeting of EphA2 looks particularly promising since MedImmune’s scientists discovered that there are several regions within EphA2 which become exposed and consequently accessible for antibodies only on cancer cells.

MedImmune views Epha2 as a very important target. In fact, it has such high hopes for it, that there it is currently evaluating multiple approaches to targeting this promising antigen. One of these approaches is Micromet’s (MITI) Bite (stands for: Bi-Specific T cell Engager) platform, which is being co-developed with Medimmune for several targets, one of which is EphA2. The Bite Platform, a very interesting technology (that deserves an article of its own being so different from other antibody-based platforms) consists of two small antibodies that link between a tumor and specific immune cells in order to manipulate them to attack the tumor. It has demonstrated very impressive potency in mice, and even more impressive results among heavily pre-treated NHL patients, mainly due to the very low doses that showed a clinical effect. The Bite platform hasn’t been evaluated in solid tumors yet, but clinical trials are expected to be announced in the future, one of them is for a Bite agent that targets Epha2. Due to its unique characteristics that present both advantages and disadvantages, it is very hard to predict Bite’s efficacy in these settings. Although some consider Bite an immunotoxin, it differs from immunoconjugates in that it does not contain any drug or toxin payload, so it is reasonable to expect that MedImmune will explore it in parallel to Seattle Genetics’ platform. Although Bite is not necessarily a direct competitor, I bet the folks at Seattle Genetics are following that program closely. Nevertheless, MedImmune seems pretty happy with Seattle Genetics’ platforms, as it has recently licensed Seattle Genetics’ ADC technology for a second undisclosed target.

 

Author is long SGEN

Seattle Genetics’ technology - The Arms Merchant

Saturday, December 8th, 2007

The capability of developing antibodies for cancer can be found at most pharma companies’ R&D centers, either as a result of internal R&D efforts or M&A activity, such as the acquisitions of Cambridge Antibody Technology and Abgenix by AstraZeneca (AZN) and Amgen (AMGN), respectively. Therefore, there is nothing unique about a company that can develop cancer antibodies, even though there are many other differentiating factors between the companies. The crucial element in developing an ADC is linking the antibody to the drug payload. As simple as this concept may sound, its realization is highly complex and challenging, and in our opinion represents the main entry barrier to the field. As ADCs are also termed “armed antibodies”, companies like Seattle Genetics can be viewed as the arms merchants of the antibody industry.

As an arms merchant, the company focuses on two areas: Technologies for conjugating antibodies to toxic drugs and potent toxic compounds that will be attached to the antibodies. The ability to develop highly potent drugs and conjugation technologies is Seattle Genetics’ main asset, since this is the ideal way to differentiate itself and to broaden the company’s pipeline through partnership deals. In an industry where the vast majority of candidates fail, it is imperative for companies like Seattle Genetics to have as many candidates as possible, even if eventually most of the revenues go to the partners. At this stage, with the limited resources Seattle Genetics has, betting on few wholly owned candidates is statistically unfeasible. Although the company has had its share of failures over the years, we believe the advances made both in terms of linkers and drugs will finally enable it to generate a constant flow of candidates into the clinic, whether independently or in collaboration with partners. In order to look at the progress that has been made so far, the best place to start is the failure of Seattle Genetics’ flagship product, SGN-15, an antibody linked to the chemo agent Doxorubicin, whose development was discontinued in mid 2005 after a series of discouraging clinical trials. On top of the usual uncertainties related to drug development, there were probably two main factors that severely sabotaged this candidate’s prospects.

The first factor was the use of an approved chemotherapy drug such as Doxorubicin as the conjugated drug. Chemotherapy agents that are conventionally administered to patients are distributed across the body and affect healthy cells as well as cancer cells, leading to the so typical side effects of chemo. Consequently, approved chemo drugs represent a fine balance between two needs: They must be strong enough in order to kill cancer cells, but not too strong, so the damage caused to normal tissues is acceptable. In contrast, when chemo drugs are linked to an antibody, they can be targeted to tumors specifically, since the antibody guides them. This enables the use of much more potent drugs, otherwise impossible to use in conventional administration. Furthermore, since only a small fraction of the administered antibodies eventually accumulate in cancer cells, it is critical that the few antibodies that do reach the tumors carry a very potent payload. This can be accomplished by two approaches: The antibody must either be loaded with a large amount of drug molecules or a small amount of very potent drug molecules. Although there are efforts on both fronts, the latter approach is more practical, at least for now. Bottom line, in order to have an effective ADC, drug developers should use chemo drugs that are too toxic to be generally administered. This approach was validated by the only FDA-approved ADC, Mylotarg, which utilizes Calicheamicin, a drug that is too toxic on a stand alone basis. Both Seattle Genetics and Immunogen (IMGN) are currently using such compounds as the basis for their ADC platforms: Seattle Genetics picked auristatin, while Immunogen focuses on maytansine. The second disadvantage in SGN-15 is linker instability. An ideal linker should be very stable in the bloodstream but also readily degradable once inside cancer cells, so it would release the free drug only inside target cells. For SGN-15, Seattle Genetics uses an acid-labile linker, which is relatively stable in neutral environment (bloodstream) and very unstable in acidic environment (present in certain compartments inside cells). This kind of linker is used very successfully in Mylotarg for the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia [AML], making Seattle Genetics’ pick very reasonable at the time. However, SGN-15’s stability in patients proved to be pretty low, mainly as a result of premature linker degradation in the bloodstream, before reaching the tumors. Mylotarg had a great success despite being based on an acid-labile linker because it attacks a blood-borne malignancy and the antibody can find its target quickly, before linker degradation and drug release. In contrast, the dense mass of solid tumors makes them far less accessible compared to blood cancers. Therefore, the ADC must be present in the bloodstream for longer periods at higher concentrations, necessitating highly stable linkers.

By the time SGN-15 was scrapped, Seattle Genetics already had its next generation of ADC technology up and running. On the drug front, the company licensed a potent drug called auristatin E from Arizona State University, which was found to be almost 200-fold more potent than Doxorubicin, and used it as a basis for its own proprietary drug, MMAE. This drug is a very potent anti-tubulin inhibitor that can be synthesized cheaply in very large quantities and subsequently be conjugated to a virtually unlimited number of different antibodies. Another appealing attribute of Seattle Genetics’ conjugation technology is the highly homogeneous population of ADCs, as oppose to other methods, including that of Immunogen. On the linker front, Seattle Genetics chose a peptide-based linker which is cleaved by enzymes that are present inside cells but not in the bloodstream. Upon cancer cell binding, ADCs are trafficked to a special compartment called lysosome, where there is an abundance of enzymes that cleave the linker and release the drug inside the cell. Seattle Genetics’ peptide linker has demonstrated an increase of more than 3-fold in stability in the bloodstream, which, combined with the high potency of MMAE, puts the company’s candidates in a better starting point.

It is crucial to understand that ADCs are not commodity products, but highly complex systems that require a great deal of customization and optimization. Multiple factors, including (but not limited to) cancer type, the target on cancer cells, exact binding site, type of linker, efficiency of drug release, mechanism of conjugation, type of drug and amount of drug payload affect the performance of each candidate. The number of variations for each ADC is high but it is impossible to predict the optimal combination in advance. Thus, the exact antibody-linker-drug combination should be tailored specifically for each ADC candidate, perhaps even for each condition the candidate is aimed at treating. In order to stay relevant, Seattle Genetics must constantly develop new linkers and drugs, in addition to developing antibodies and identifying attractive cancer related targets. It is not surprising though, that the company is currently developing next generation linkers and drugs that will possibly be employed in future projects.

Author is long SGEN

The “Naked” Truth About Antibodies For Cancer Therapy- Part I

Thursday, July 5th, 2007

Antibodies are naturally occurring proteins that help our body fight bacteria, viruses and cancer. Upon its release into the blood stream, an antibody can identify and bind a specific pathogen, and by doing so, it can neutralize the pathogen or “flag” it for attack by the immune system. Our body is able to generate antibodies against a virtually infinite number of targets, thanks to brilliant biological mechanisms developed throughout the course of evolution. Once a pathogen enters our body, our immune system conducts a high-throughput screen of all the antibodies it can generate (around 10 billion different antibodies). After the appropriate antibodies are selected, special white blood cells called B-cell lymphocytes enter a mass production phase in which large amounts of the selected antibodies are secreted into the blood stream “in search” of their specific target. The combination of diversity on the one hand and specificity on the other hand, makes antibodies a crucial component of our defense mechanism. This combination also makes antibodies an extremely popular platform among drug companies.

  (more…)