<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Synta Break A 30 Year Old Record? (Part I)</title>
	<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/</link>
	<description>Biotech stock reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Another one bites the dust...

Elesclomol fails phase III trial

http://skincancer.about.com/b/2009/03/01/stunning-disappointment-for-melanoma-drug.htm

FYI, five other possibilities in the melanoma market:

http://skincancer.about.com/od/treatmentoptions/a/melanoma_trials.htm

Great site, thanks for your hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one bites the dust&#8230;</p>
<p>Elesclomol fails phase III trial</p>
<p><a href="http://skincancer.about.com/b/2009/03/01/stunning-disappointment-for-melanoma-drug.htm" rel="nofollow">http://skincancer.about.com/b/2009/03/01/stunning-disappointment-for-melanoma-drug.htm</a></p>
<p>FYI, five other possibilities in the melanoma market:</p>
<p><a href="http://skincancer.about.com/od/treatmentoptions/a/melanoma_trials.htm" rel="nofollow">http://skincancer.about.com/od/treatmentoptions/a/melanoma_trials.htm</a></p>
<p>Great site, thanks for your hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohad Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohad Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Antisoma looks very interesting indeed. Strong data.
Thanks for bringing it up, Dean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antisoma looks very interesting indeed. Strong data.<br />
Thanks for bringing it up, Dean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean</title>
		<link>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hammerstockblog.com/will-synta-break-a-30-year-old-record-part-i/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Am a medical oncologist who occasionally invests in biotech. Nice article on snta-agree that the phase 2 data not perfect but good (i'm long). Also, nice comments re the multitude of single arm phase 2 studies which are followed by negative phase 3 studies. Another interesting company with randomized phase 2 data is antisoma (i'm also long).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am a medical oncologist who occasionally invests in biotech. Nice article on snta-agree that the phase 2 data not perfect but good (i&#8217;m long). Also, nice comments re the multitude of single arm phase 2 studies which are followed by negative phase 3 studies. Another interesting company with randomized phase 2 data is antisoma (i&#8217;m also long).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

